The impact of poor data quality on your organisation
30.06.2022When you think about what can go wrong in a company, HR data are probably not the first thing that comes to mind. After all, data are just numbers and letters – how dangerous can they be? In reality, HR data are a sensitive and vulnerable resource that, if misused or damaged, can have very harmful consequences for your company.
With good HR data, your company can respond more quickly to trends and opportunities, increase operational efficiency, improve productivity and profitability, and facilitate expansion into new markets. But without them? In this blog post, we list four negative consequences of poor HR data. Would you like to hear more stories about how not to use HR data (or how to use it effectively)? Then be sure to read our book Reinventing HR Data or to subscribe to our bi-monthly newsletter for tips and trends.
1. Lack of trust in data leads to poor decisions
We start with the basics: if people do not trust the quality of the data, they will not base decisions on it. This lack of trust can be due to various factors: the data may be inconsistent across departments, it may take too long to collect and analyse, or it may be inaccurate due to a faulty system or human error. The headache associated with trying to reconcile incompatible datasets also often leads people to stop using data altogether. And that is exactly what you want to avoid.
If people do not trust their data, they will likely choose for themselves which data they will use for any insights. In doing so, they may ignore potentially useful insights because they do not want to feel that they are making decisions based on poor information. This lack of trust paralyses decision-making, with managers choosing to rely on their intuition rather than on data-driven insights.
2. Poor data quality can lead to fraudulent behaviour
Poor data can create the perfect environment for fraud within your company and lead to significant financial losses. Fraud generally involves people manipulating data in order to ‘misappropriate’ money or other assets from a company. This may be an individual employee making false claims about working hours or payroll data that do not correspond to reality. Fraudulent data can even be caused by the desire to achieve organisational goals at the expense of reliability or quality. In such cases, data are often presented more favourably than they are in reality.
To combat the risk of fraud, companies must have systems in place to identify and investigate unusual activities. Poor data can, however, make this much more difficult. If you cannot rely on your systems to provide accurate data about employees' working hours or pay scales, it becomes much harder to identify false claims.
3. Incorrect data lead to reputational damage
Incorrect data can lead employees to lose trust in your company in various ways. Poor data quality and a lack of transparency in data processing can lead to privacy-related issues. It can also cause your company to make errors or miscalculations that directly affect internal and external stakeholders, such as sending incorrect payslips to employees or promoting employees unfairly. In systems that do not distinguish between similar names or contain typographical errors in ID numbers, such situations can occur quickly.
If employees feel that you do not have control over your data, they are also likely to lose confidence in your overall ability to run a reliable and efficient business. In addition, poor data can lead to people being treated unfairly, with systems accidentally blocking them or systematically excluding them on the basis of data. A CV screening process based solely on information from historical CVs could inadvertently result in only white men without a history of work limitations being invited for interviews. This clearly leads to poor PR and can seriously damage your brand.
4. Correcting poor data leads to avoidable costs
When you have poor data in your systems, it can be a more difficult task to find and remove them. In this case as well, it is better to prevent poor data quality in the first place and pay the necessary attention to data input. Data quality problems can be caused by a wide variety of reasons: inaccurate data entry due to human error, errors introduced by automated systems during data entry, outdated data or missing elements, and data transferred from one system to another in a format that cannot be properly read.
You also cannot clean up these data with the push of a button once they have caused a problem. It takes time and money to determine where the issue originated, manually adjust the raw data and rerun all subsequent analyses.
Sometimes this even means redesigning the entire data collection process or reversing or containing the negative consequences. You may then need to minimise delays in business-critical processes and even restore the correct access to systems for the people who need it. A doctor suddenly losing access to the operating theatre because their badge is no longer recognised is just one of the consequences of poor data that you would rather not have on your conscience.
Conclusion: start at the source
Data are an incredibly valuable resource that can make or break your company if not managed properly. It is easy to see the enormous costs associated with resolving data issues, but it is much more difficult to quantify the additional losses that companies suffer as a result of poor data quality. The good news is that all of these problems can be addressed at the source – by ensuring that you collect high-quality data.
Would you like to stay informed about other interesting insights on HR analytics? Then be sure to subscribe to our free bi-monthly newsletter for tips and trends.